Brussels, June 7 (IANS) NATO defence ministers meeting in Brussels, “broadly” agreed to pursue a significant increase in member states’ military spending to 5 per cent of GDP. However, sharp disagreements over the timeline and spending categories revealed deep divisions ahead of the alliance’s upcoming summit in The Hague, scheduled for June 24-25.
“There’s broad support. We are really close,” Mark Rutte, NATO’s secretary general, told reporters after the meeting. He stressed that he has “total confidence that we will get there” by the next NATO summit in three weeks.
Rutte proposed a compromise plan: setting a target of 3.5 per cent of GDP for core military spending, and an additional 1.5 per cent for broader security-related areas such as infrastructure, by 2032, Xinhua news agency reported.
Member states are facing increasing pressure from the US, which first floated the 5 per cent target late last year. Washington has repeatedly urged its allies to raise defence budgets under the threat of reducing its security commitments in Europe.
“To be an alliance, you got to be more than flags. You got to be formations. You got to be more than conferences. You need to be, keep combat-ready capabilities,” US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said as he arrived for the meeting of defense ministers on Thursday.
He acknowledged ongoing disagreements, saying, “There are a few countries that are not quite there yet… We will get them there.”
The sharpest differences emerged over the 2032 deadline and which expenditures count toward the two categories. While some countries criticised the timeline as too slow, others argued that the target is unattainable given current budgetary and industrial limitations.
Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene pushed for an earlier deadline, insisting that 2032 is “definitely too late” and advocating for a 2030 target. Estonian Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur noted Estonia would reach 5 per cent by next year and urged other nations to follow suit within five years.
In contrast, countries such as Spain, Germany, and Belgium expressed concerns about feasibility. For them, meeting the 5 per cent goal would be “extremely difficult.” The United Kingdom and Italy, meanwhile, are aiming for a more moderate goal of raising core defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP by 2035.
According to NATO data, 23 of its 32 members are expected to meet the 2-per cent-of-GDP defence spending threshold by the end of this summer. Spain and Italy have pledged to reach that level by year-end, while Canada projects compliance by 2027.
Defence ministers also approved updated NATO capability targets, which outline the military capacities needed to support operational plans and ensure collective defence. Priorities include air and missile defense, long-range strike capabilities, logistics, and large-scale land maneuver forces.
Germany pledged a strong contribution to NATO’s military expansion, with Defence Minister Boris Pistorius announcing plans to add 60,000 active-duty troops.
“Given Germany’s size and economic strength, we will shoulder a significant part of NATO’s military build-up,” Pistorius said. However, Germany continues to grapple with personnel shortages. Despite ramped-up recruitment, troop numbers fell further last year, while the average age of soldiers continued to rise.
Across the alliance, economic headwinds and tight national budgets pose further obstacles. The Netherlands estimates it will need to spend an additional 16 to 19 billion euros ($18.24 to 21.66 billion) annually to meet its obligations, Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans told parliament.
Belgium’s Budget Minister Vincent Van Peteghem cautioned in April that increased defence expenditures could come at the cost of welfare programs.
“Every euro that’s a deficit today … is a euro that will be debt, and that debt will be one day a tax or a cut and in the social welfare state,” he told the Financial Times. “Defence definitely requires our full attention, but so does also the sustainability of our welfare state.”
–IANS
int/rs
Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by BhaskarLive.in and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of BhaskarLive.in We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, BhaskarLive.in takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.
For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.
Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.
If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.
