Madras HC remarks revive debate on Tamil Nadu’s toddy ban

Tiruchi (Tamil Nadu), June 15 (IANS) A fresh debate over the withdrawal of Tamil Nadu’s nearly four-decade-old ban on toddy tapping and sale has emerged after the Madras High Court’s Madurai Bench suggested that the state government explore ways to encourage toddy production and marketing.

The discussion has gained momentum among farmers, toddy tappers, agricultural experts and rural livelihood advocates, who argue that regulated toddy production could strengthen the rural economy, generate employment, and help conserve the state’s vast population of palmyra trees.

The issue came into focus following observations made by a bench of Justice B. Pugalendhi while hearing a case linked to an incident involving a toddy tapper in Tenkasi.

During the proceedings, the judge suggested that the government devise measures to encourage toddy tapping and promote the beverage by highlighting its nutritional and other beneficial attributes.

Although Tamil Nadu banned toddy tapping and sale from January 1, 1987, citing concerns over adulteration, supporters of the traditional drink point out that neighbouring Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, and Puducherry continue to regulate and permit toddy sales through licensed outlets.

Welcoming the court’s remarks, Tamil Nadu Toddy Movement Coordinator C. Nallasamy said the organisation had long been demanding the lifting of the ban. He argued that toddy was a traditional food product rather than merely an alcoholic beverage and said the government should follow the example of neighbouring states.

“We have raised this demand before successive governments, and now place it before Chief Minister C. Joseph Vijay. Lifting the ban will significantly boost the rural economy and support thousands of families dependent on palmyra and coconut-based occupations,” he said.

Nallasamy claimed that palmyra trees play a crucial role in protecting the environment while generating income in rural areas. He also stressed that the trees require little water, thrive in diverse climatic conditions and contribute to several traditional industries.

Agricultural economist A.P. Palanichamy said toddy has been part of rural food culture for generations and contains relatively low alcohol content due to natural fermentation. He noted that regulated toddy sales generate substantial revenue in Kerala and Andhra Pradesh, where authorities have also introduced value-added and flavoured toddy products.

With the High Court’s observations reigniting the discussion, stakeholders are urging the Tamil Nadu government to examine whether a regulated toddy industry can coexist with public health safeguards while supporting traditional livelihoods, rural employment, and the conservation of palmyra resources.

–IANS

aal/vd