Chennai, Oct 28 (IANS) The Madras High Court has set aside an order of the Alandur Judicial Magistrate Court accepting the closure report filed by the Central Crime Branch (CCB) police in a case registered against Santiago Martin, his wife Lima Rose and three others.
The court allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against the acceptance of the closure report by the Magistrate court.
The case was related to the seizure of Rs 7.20 crore from the residence of M. Nagarajan at Thillai Ganga Nagar in Nanganallur on March 12, 2012.
A day later, an amount of Rs 50 lakh was seized from the residence of his associate G. Moorthy.
Further investigation revealed that they, along with the lottery baron, were involved in the sale of banned lottery tickets in Chennai.
The suspects, on the other hand, claimed the seized money was the advance amount given by the lottery baron’s wife to Moorthy for purchasing a house worth Rs 12.30 crore at Anna Nagar in Chennai.
The accused also claimed to have declared the transaction in the Income Tax returns.
Pursuant to their explanation, the CCB chose to close the case and the Magistrate also accepted this and closed the case.
A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and V. Sivagangai on Monday allowed a criminal revision petition filed by the ED against the acceptance of the closure report by the Magistrate court.
Madras High court division bench also permitted the ED as well as the CCB to continue the prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) of 2002.
A.R.L. Sundaresan, Additional Solicitor General representing the ED informed the court that no accused would be allowed to go scot-free from a major economic offence.
He also said that ED was unable to probe the matter under the PMLA of 2002 as an investigating officer attached to the CCB had decided to close the case booked for the predicate offence.
A.R.L. Sundaresan also said that the ED had all the rights to request the High Court to find out whether the CCB was justified in closing the case and whether the magistrate had given a proper thought before accepting the closure report.
He said that there were enough materials to doubt that the suspects had created an ante-dated false sale agreement related to an immovable property for explaining the possession of Rs 7.20 crore in cash.
–IANS
aal/uk
Disclaimer
The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by BhaskarLive.in and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website.
Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of BhaskarLive.in We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them.
Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, BhaskarLive.in takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control.
For any legal details or query please visit original source link given with news or click on Go to Source.
Our translation service aims to offer the most accurate translation possible and we rarely experience any issues with news post. However, as the translation is carried out by third part tool there is a possibility for error to cause the occasional inaccuracy. We therefore require you to accept this disclaimer before confirming any translation news with us.
If you are not willing to accept this disclaimer then we recommend reading news post in its original language.
